Filed under: Democrat Corruption, Military, National Security, News, Politics, Progressivism | Tags: Afghanistan, Democrat lies, General Petraeus, President Bush
How anyone who votes Democrat can even face themselves in the mirror is utterly beyond me.
Filed under: Law, News the Media Doesn't Want You to Hear, Politics, Terrorism | Tags: Black-Clad Anarchists, G-20 Meeting in Toronto, Useless Meeting
Riot police arrested more than 150 rioters at the G-20 meeting in Toronto.
Riot Police stand ready to arrest violent Tea Party activists.
Filed under: Capitalism, Economy, Law, Taxes | Tags: Income Mobility, What is Fair, Who Pays Taxes
The Congressional Budget Office has analyzed the 2007 income-tax files. These graphs show the quintiles into which the Treasury Department divides American taxpayers according to income shown by IRS figures. The United States has the most progressive federal tax system of any developed country. Here, in the first graph, are the quintiles of taxpayer income, by percent of all income.
The second shows taxes paid by each quintile of taxpayers by percent of taxes paid. Each graph can be enlarged by clicking on it.
Here the graph demonstrates the share of pretax income paid, and the shares of total taxes paid by all.
The highest quintile of earners, the fabled “rich” pay 70 percent of all taxes paid. Is that enough, too much? What does this information do to all the “soak the rich” demands? Most people when queried about how much taxes anyone should pay, believe that no one should pay over 25 percent.
Obama’s redistributive policies are based on a concern that there is too big an income gap between the rich and the poor. But the poor are not getting poorer, they are getting richer too. Nearly 60 percent of taxpayers move up from the bottom quintile within ten years. Nearly 40 percent of taxpayers move down from the top quintile during the same period.
A report from the Tax Foundation, once again shows that roughly half of millionaires during the period w999 through 2007 attained this status just once during those nine years. Only 6 percent of this group were millionaires in all nine years.
The problem with all the political attacks on “the rich” and the complaints about the “income gap” is that they are based on snapshots of the population at a moment in time, and do not recognize the extraordinary mobility of Americans through income distribution. Most people start out poor, their income grows as they rise through a working life, and declines as it ends and they enter retirement years.
Keep in mind that most jobs are created by those upper quintiles. So what is fair, and what is moral?
Filed under: Democrat Corruption, Domestic Policy, Economy, Environment, Science/Technology | Tags: Deepwater Horizon Spill, Gulf of Mexico, How to Bungle a Crisis
Seventy Days in:
The National Incident Command and the Federal On Scene Coordinator have determined that there is a resource need for boom and skimmers that can be met by offers of assistance from foreign governments and international bodies.
The United States will accept 22 offers of assistance from 12 countries and international bodies, including two high-speed skimmers and fire containment boom from Japan. We are currently working out the particular modalities of delivering the offered assistance. Further details will be forthcoming once these arrangements are complete…
Three days after the BP Deepwater Horizon Rig blew up on April 20, the Netherlands offered the U.S. government ships equipped to handle a major spill — one much larger than the spill that was then under way. The chairman of Spill Response Group Holland said that each Dutch ship had more cleanup capacity than all the ships the U.S. was then employing in the Gulf to combat the spill.
To protect against the possibility that the equipment wouldn’t capture all of the oil gushing from the well, the Dutch also offered to help the U.S. with a contingency plan to protect Louisiana’s marshlands with sand barriers. A Dutch research institute specializing deltas, coastal areas and rivers developed a strategy to begin building 60-mile long sand dikes within three weeks.
Why didn’t it happen? First of all there’s the Jones Act (the Merchant Marine Act of 1920) intended to protect maritime unions, which precludes a foreign flagged ship from operating near the U.S. Coast. In the case of Katrina, the Jones Act was waived by the Bush Administration within 3 Days. That’s not all, the superior European technology runs afoul of U.S. environmental rules. The Dutch ships can suck up vast quantities of oily water, extract most of the oil and then spit overboard vast quantities of nearly oil-free water. That is not good enough for U.S. regulators. Better to have no oil soaked up than return water that has more than 15 parts per million of oil to the Gulf of Mexico. Water that is not 99.9985%pure is just not good enough.
The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 requires regions to have minimum levels of equipment such as booms and skimmers.
Admiral Allen, the incident commander, said that there are “discussions we’re having across the entire country where we have equipment that’s out there as a requirement — legal requirement to cover spill response of those areas — and how we might free those up. That’s a work in progress inside the administration right now. “
The head of French oil spill response company. Ecoceane, said the Jones Act and other difficulties getting through to BP prevented his company from putting boats to work sooner. He has boats to work offshore, but also smaller models to work in shallower inland waters. In the end, he sold nine spill response boats to a Florida company last week. That makes them American boats and gets around Jones Act problems.
The spill is tangled in a web of red-tape, with way too many officials in charge of conflicting regulations, conflicting power, conflicting responsibility. Allen may be the incident commander, but apparently he does not have any overriding authority, so everything winds up in endless debates and discussions. A textbook case of how to bungle a crisis. One of the first things they did was to send down a bunch of lawyers.
Filed under: Capitalism, Democrat Corruption, Economy, Law, Progressivism | Tags: Negotiable Law?, The Justice Department, The Rule of Law
Do you remember the New Black Panther case? On the day that Barack Obama was elected president, there were pictures all over the news of two very large black men in black berets and jackboots, standing at the entrance to a polling place in Philadelphia, brandishing nightsticks and intimidating voters and poll watchers.
The Justice Department brought a voter-intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party and those armed thugs. In an essay in the Washington Times, J. Christian Adams says that he and other Justice attorneys “diligently pursued the case and obtained an entry of default after the defendants ignored the charges. Before a final judgment could be entered in May 2009, our superiors ordered us to dismiss the case. Mr. Adams says:
The New Black Panther case was the simplest and most obvious violation of federal law I saw in my Justice Department career. Because of the corrupt nature of the dismissal, statements falsely characterizing the case and, most of all, indefensible orders for the career attorneys not to comply with lawful subpoenas investigating the dismissal, this month I resigned my position as a Department of Justice (DOJ) attorney. (…)
Based on my firsthand experiences, I believe the dismissal of the Black Panther case was motivated by a lawless hostility toward equal enforcement of the law. Others still within the department share my assessment. The department abetted wrongdoers and abandoned law-abiding citizens victimized by the New Black Panthers. The dismissal raises serious questions about the department’s enforcement neutrality in upcoming midterm elections and the subsequent 2012 presidential election.
The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has opened an investigation into the dismissal and the DOJ’s skewed enforcement priorities. Attorneys who brought the case are under subpoena to testify, but the department ordered us to ignore the subpoena, lawlessly placing us in an unacceptable legal limbo.
This is a truly disturbing accusation by a lawyer who served as a voting rights attorney at the Justice Department until this month. Do read the whole thing.
Victor Davis Hanson has also noticed, as have many others, that we have seldom if ever “seen such a systematic attack on our framework of laws at the present assault from the executive branch.” Federal Judge Martin Feldman ruled that Obama’s moratorium on drilling in the Gulf was unconstitutional, but the administration plans to try to reinstate it anyway, in spite of the damage to the Gulf Coast economy.
The president’s order to BP to establish a $20 billion payout fund, is clearly illegal without a court order or legislation, as is the administration decision to ignore past legal precedent capping oil-company liability. Or there is the executive order that overturned established bankruptcy laws, the legally determined order of creditors, and put his own campaign donors first in line.
Obama plans to sue Arizona for their laws duplicating unenforced federal law. Secretary of Labor, Hilda Solis, produced a video advising workers that they have a right to be paid fairly, whether documented or not. Illegal is fine, unfair pay is not. If you don’t like the law, just ignore it.
This is very serious stuff, and a casual hostility to the rule of law —by lawyers! Do read the whole thing.
Filed under: Democrat Corruption, Economy, Environment, Politics, Science/Technology | Tags: Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill, Government Apathy, Where Are the Skimmers
Sixty-eight days after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill began, the headline reads “No Skimmers in Sight as Oil Floods Into Mississippi Waters.”
A morning flight over the Mississippi Sound showed long, wide ribbons of orange-colored oil for as far as the eye could see and acres of both heavy and light sheen moving into the Sound between the barrier islands. What was missing was any sign of skimming operations from Horn Island to Pass Christian. U.S. Rep. Gene Taylor got off the flight angry. ‘It’s criminal what’s going on out there,’ Taylor said minutes later. ‘This doesn’t have to happen.’ A scientist onboard, Mike Carron with the Northern Gulf Institute, said with this scenario, there will be oil on the beaches of the mainland. ‘There’s oil in the Sound and there was no skimming,’ Carron said. ‘No coordinated effort.’”
The blog ‘So It Goes in Shreveport’ offers this depressing bit: “Admiral Allen was asked about the lack of skimmers by Carol Rosenberg of the Miami Herald. His response? ‘The discussions we are having with the Navy and other folks right now is the availability of skimmers that are on standby because they might be needed for a spill someplace else and how we might go about assessing the availability of those resources. So I would separate out the resources that the Navy had that they’ve already given to us and the discussions we’re having across the entire country where we have equipment that’s out there as a requirement — legal requirement to cover spill response of those areas and how we might free those up, and that’s a work in progress inside the administration right now.’ Got that? We’ve got skimmers on standby but can’t use them because they might be needed somewhere else.”
The “A Whale” is the world’s largest oil skimmer, and it has sat in port in Norfolk, Virginia, waiting for approval from the Coast Guard, BP, and President Obama to go where the oil needs skimming instead of just sitting in port. The ship is a converted oil tanker, built in South Korea, was refitted in the wake of the BP oil spill with twelve 16-foot long intake vents on the sides of its bow designed to skim oil off surface waters.
The vessel’s billionaire owner, Nobu Su, the CEO of Taiwanese shipping company TMT Group, said the ship would float across the Gulf “like a lawn mower cutting the grass” sucking up to 500,000 barrels of oil-contaminated water a day. The ship stands 10 stories tall, is 1,115 feet long and has nearly a 200 foot beam, and displaces more water than an aircraft carrier. It set sail on Friday for the Gulf.
The company still does not have government approval to assist in the cleanup, not does it have a contract with BP to perform the work. All this potential assistance, from A Whale or from all the skimmers offered by other nations, doesn’t come free, but the costs of the spill on the entire Gulf region aren’t exactly free either.
Filed under: Economy, Energy, Politics, Science/Technology | Tags: Deepwater Horizon Spill, Kevin Costner, Oil/Water Centrifuges
Kevin Costner has spent 15 years and invested $20 million promoting his oil-separating centrifuge machines, and at last it has paid off. BP was so impressed after putting the machines through a test run, that it has ordered 32 of the machines to help with cleanup efforts on the Gulf Coast.
The centrifuges are capable of processing 128,000 barrels of water a day. Costner and BP CEO Doug Settles recently held a press conference. Settles said:
We tested it in some of the toughest environments we could find, and actually what it’s done — it’s quite robust. This is real technology with real science behind it , and it’s passed all those tests.
Needless to say, Kevin Costner is quite pleased that someone is finally willing to listen and test. We do have an odd prejudice that movie people are a little flaky about the real world.
(h/t: Planet Gore)
Filed under: Capitalism, Domestic Policy, Economy, Politics, Statism | Tags: Democrat Corruption, Irresponsible Spending, Neo-Keynesian Spending
Representative Paul Ryan (R-WI) is the ranking member of the House Budget Committee. He has been terrific on all matters to do with finance, budget and economics, and with a White House on a uncontrolled spending spree, it’s very worthwhile to listen to someone who actually understands such things.
On the lessons from Europe:
We are doubling down on this neo-Keynesian borrow and spend spree. It’s not working. We’ve lost 3.6 million jobs since the last stimulus was passed and they want to do more of the same. Bailing out state governments is the next roll of the dice. We are copying European economic policies of the past and that is going to give us a European kind of debt crisis in the future if we don’t change our policies. Yet the President is doubling down, giving us a big debt hangover.
On whether there will be the votes in Congress for the President’s demands for more spending:
The President got those same centrist Democrats to vote for a budget that doubles our debt in five years and triples our debt in ten years. He got those same centrist Democrats to vote for $1.8 trillion dollars in new spending and $670 billion in new taxes in this session of Congress. He has always gotten, along with Speaker Pelosi, the votes needed to engage in their continued spending spree.
On Washington’s failed economic doctrine:
What we have right now is a neo-Keynesian model being pushed, which means spend, spend, spend — and they still have no problem with all of these tax increases. This economic doctrine conveniently fits a political ideology. This political agenda is built upon building government programs, building up spending — and they use this economic doctrine to satisfy their political pent up demand. The so-called “stimulus” was not about jobs as much as it was spending money on all these programs that they have wanted to spend on for a long time. Now that they have Congress and the White House, the spending spigot is wide open.
On better solutions from House Republicans:
In Congress, Eric Cantor, the House Republican Whip, has formed an economic growth working group, focused on jobs and economic recovery. I put out an alternative budget last year that cut 4.8 trillion out of the spending line and actually got us on track to pay off our debt. This year, Democrats are not even doing a budget. House Republicans continue to put out better alternatives — aimed to keep taxes low, get a grip on spending and entitlements, and prevent us from becoming a stagnant welfare state, which is clearly unsustainable as we’re seeing in Europe.
On having a better grasp than most in Congress on economic issues:
It’s not a very high bar to clear.
Democrat Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia has died. May he rest in peace. Our condolences to his family and loved ones.
Vice President Cheney was admitted to George Washington University Hospital after complaining of “discomfort” yesterday. He is expected to stay in hospital through the weekend for observation and tests, but that’s about all that is known at this point.
We hope all is well and pray for his full and speedy recovery! And send our love to him and his family.
Update: Good news: tests show it wasn’t a heart attack. Godspeed Mr. Cheney! And take care of that ticker! We want you around for a very long time!
(h/t Michelle Malkin)
Filed under: Capitalism, Democrat Corruption, Economy, Law | Tags: Does Not Address the Causes, The Financial Crisis, The Financial-Regulation Bill
Congress is soon going to vote on a final financial-regulation bill. Differences were hammered out in a closed-door conference room between the two chambers. The authors, Representative Barney Frank (D-MA) and Senator Christopher Dodd (D-CT), were either authors of or supporters of the distortions that led to the financial crisis in the first place. So naturally, these two foxes have been put in charge of the fencing around the henhouse.
The Democrat view of the financial crisis says that the whole thing was the fault of Wall Street fat cats who must be to blame for the credit crisis. After all, Democrats plan, this fall, to run against corporations, business, Wall Street, and BP since they think that will be more effective than running against George W. Bush.
Republicans, who do look into the evidence rather than just address the problem emotionally, point out the endless federal incentives and mandates to offer mortgages to potential home-owners who cannot afford to repay those loans. In spite of any recognition that mortgages were offered to unqualified individuals and families — banks will still be required by the Dodd-Frank bill to meet government-mandated quotas for lending to people who would not meet prudent banking rules for extending credit.
The legislation also ignores the role of loose monetary policy in driving the housing bubble. Such a bubble can result only when there is cheap and plentiful credit. When there is a negative real federal funds rate — one is essentially being paid to borrow — is there any wonder that people were buying houses to flip?
The loans made by subprime lenders were sold to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or the government corporation Ginnie Mae. Had these institutions not been there to buy these loans, most of them would never have been made — in spite of protests and pickets by ACORN. Had the taxpayers not been standing behind Fannie and Freddie, they would not have been able to fund such large purchases of subprime mortgages.
Rather than fix the endless bailouts by Fannie and Freddie, Congress believes that it is more important to expand federal regulation and litigation to lenders who had nothing to do with the crisis.
Congress may well not understand the role of loose monetary policy, nor know what to do about it. They surely have some slight understanding of the role of Fannie and Freddie. They have been warned often and often that reform is needed. But then they have been warned for years that Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid must be reformed, and they have ignored that for years and years. Congress has the unenviable choice of voting for a bill that does not address the real problems, or kicking it down the road in the hope that better leadership in the next Congress will produce a bill that actually fixes something.
Chickens, as they say, are coming home to roost — in a poorly constructed henhouse constructed by the two foxes that knew nothing about construction.
ADDENDUM: I forgot to mention that this is another 2.000 page monstrosity. Chris Dodd (D-CT) , one of the authors of the bill, said that they would have to wait until it was passed to find out if the regulations in it would work. (I paraphrase). Gives you all sorts of confidence in the actions of the U.S. Congress, doesn’t it?