American Elephants


The Political War — Another Take. by The Elephant's Child

Time Magazine’s Mark Halperin writes on “Why Obama is Losing the Political War.”

With the exception of core Obama Administration loyalists, most politically engaged elites have reached the same conclusions: the White House is in over its head, isolated, insular, arrogant and clueless about how to get along with or persuade members of Congress, the media, the business community or working-class voters.  This view is held by Fox News pundits, executives and anchors at the major old-media outlets, reporters who cover the White House, Democratic and Republican congressional leaders and governors, many Democratic business people who raised big money for Obama in 2008, and even some members of the Administration just beyond the inner circle.

On Friday, after the release of the latest bleak unemployment data — the last major jobs figures before the midterms — Obama said, “Putting the American people back to work, expanding opportunity, rebuilding the economic security of the middle class is the moral and national challenge of our time.” But elites feel the President has failed to meet that challenge and are convinced he will be unable to do so in the remainder of his term. Moreover, there is a growing perception that Obama’s decisions are causing harm — that businesses are being hurt by the Administration’s legislation and that economic recovery is stalling because of the uncertainty surrounding energy policy, health care, deficits, housing, immigration and spending.
This is from a liberal writer for the liberal media. His description of the conclusions of the political elite may be spot on.  His analysis of what President Obama has done — or not done — is not.   I think Obama came into office enraged at President Bush.  Obama did not expect to be faced with a problematic economy, and was furious that he had to spend time and effort at that instead of directly beginning to transform America.  He could not stop blaming George W. Bush at every turn and in every speech, for everything.

For whatever reason, the president settled upon a vast Keynesian stimulus to give the economy a corrective jolt.  Though he talked of “shovel-ready projects’ and “repairing infrastructure” most of the money went to governmental agencies and state governments. Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers Christina Romer was reduced to reading print-outs from Keynesian computer programs that estimated how many jobs should be “created” from how many dollars dumped into the economy. His economic advisers were asked to “run the numbers,” not to have any influence on policy.

The economy saved, Obama turned his attention back to transforming America, and ordered up a massive reform of health care, which was not high on anybody’s list and began investing in a “clean energy economy” which was not even on anybody’s list.  The public is fairly dubious that there is any global warming.

With policies poorly considered and executed, he kept adding thousands more to the unemployment rolls; shutting down car dealers, slapping a moratorium on oil drilling everywhere,  investing in “clean energy” that sent the money to China and Spain.  With that taken care of, he turned his attention to ‘reforming’ Wall Street, building high-speed trains, wind farms and solar arrays while ignoring the very large elephant in the room — millions of Americans unable to find work. Annoying, so he went on vacation.

I don’t think anyone in the administration has any idea how jobs are created.  Things like tax-cuts are Republican things. The private business sector is something that Republicans are always talking about and Obama is out there now trying to demonize the Chamber of Commerce. The Chamber of Commerce!  Who does he think hires people?

I don’t think there is the slightest chance that President Obama will shift to the center after the election.  We’ll see.

About these ads

1 Comment so far
Leave a comment

No, I doubt he will seek common ground. He will talk that game, but he will likely contribute to gridlock, and then blame the Republicans. It would be nice to be wrong about this, but it seems a likely course of action.

Such a strategy, used by more than one politician in the past (Chicago’s late Mayor Harold Washington, and the City Council being prime examples of this kind of abuse of office — I guess that dates me:)) is about publicity, fund raising, and image control rather than serving the interests of the country.

Comment by zeusiswatching




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,620 other followers

%d bloggers like this: