By: The Elephant's Child

The Elephant's Child — Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:36:32 +0000

Because no respectable conservative would think that government has to tell us what kind of light bulbs to use, and not just ask us to consider it, but force the lightbulbs we have been using off the market. Conservatives would point out that you can possibly save a little money by using CFL bulbs if you choose.

The problem, of course, is that most people don’t like the damn things. They flicker, they take forever to turn on, and the light is unpleasant. The halogen bulbs that are supposed to make up for the failings of CFLs— even the manufacturers admit that the technology is not ready for prime time. They are exceedingly directional, and have baffles to try to spread the light somewhat unsuccessfully, and they cost an arm and a leg.

The idea was to “save the planet” by using less energy by “reducing our dependence on foreign oil” but “foreign oil” does not produce our electricity. Conservatives are inclined to let the free market work: Those who are anxious to save on their power bills and don’t mind the CFLs will choose those, those who like incandescents buy the usual kind. Free markets, free choice. Liberals always want to order everyone around. We don’t tolerate name-calling around here.

By: Frank

Frank — Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:09:59 +0000

How are CFL bulbs a “liberal” thing?

You are an idiot trying to make something out of nothing.

Comments on: Oh Swell, Those Twisty CFL Bulbs Linked to Increased Eye Disease.

By: The Elephant's Child

By: Frank