American Elephants


Here’s an Idea For Cutting Spending: End the Wind Industry Subsidy! by The Elephant's Child

There’s an idea that has dominated many industries, particularly in technology. The first prototypes will be prohibitively expensive, but once you get into mass production the prices will drop enough to be accessible to all. We have examples galore in the computer industry. But it is not a rule that applies universally.

This was assumed by many to be the role that renewable energy would play. Wind and solar energy have been harnessed for centuries, often usefully. It was thought that with new high-tech turbines sited in the windiest places to be found, that wind energy, which is essentially free, could replace high cost imported oil and gas. Governments offered generous subsidies and governments obligingly slapped on mandates to insure that the energy they were subsidizing got used.

Anything offered by government becomes deeply involved with politics and lobbying, it was not long before it was apparent that the great new wind turbines were also bird cuisinarts. So the wind industry not only gets subsidies and mandates, but it also gets a de facto exemption from prosecution under some of America’s oldest wildlife laws. This is an era when you can be prosecuted for picking up a dislodged feather from your front walk. Really. In the history of American business it would be hard to find an industry that has enjoyed more political favoritism than the wind-energy industry now enjoys.

The Production Tax Credit (PTC) is the subsidy, and it expires this year. If Congress does not renew it, the wind industry will shut down. That simple. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IO) who supports an extension of the tax credit said: “If we’re going to have a discussion of which industries merit federal support and which don’t, the discussion needs to be intellectually honest.” Good idea, but Sen. Grassley also supports putting a large percentage of our food crops into our gas tanks.

First, you have to keep in mind some simple facts that often get lost. Wind produces only electricity. It does not replace ‘imports of foreign oil.” Wind has been harnessed for centuries, never very profitably. It ground grain, pumped water, and powered sailing ships when they were not becalmed. Wind is intermittent and unreliable. It blows in wafts, puffs, breezes, gales and hurricanes, and more variations in between. It can stop blowing for days on end. That is the nature of wind, and no technology will change that nature.

We have developed very high-tech turbines, huge turbines, but to function efficiently turbines need a steady velocity of wind. That’s what they are talking about when they speak of capacity — the perfect wind at the perfect speed, blowing constantly. Doesn’t happen. That means that there must be a backup of some sort for the moments or hours or days when the wind does not blow. That means you must have a conventional power plant ready to ramp up when the wind dies.

On a raw, per-unit-of energy-produced basis, subsidies to the wind sector are more than 200 times as great as those given to the oil-and-gas sector. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that tax preferences for renewable electricity production in 2011 totaled $1.4 billion. Most of that went to wind-energy which produces 60 times as much electricity as the solar-energy sector.

That $1.4 billion doesn’t include any of the $3.25 billion in tax-free grants given to the wind-energy sector by the Treasury Department by the Stimulus. You have surely heard Democrats complaining about the subsidy that goes to the oil and gas industry.

The preferences for the fossil-fuel sector totaled $2.5 billion in 2011. The wind sector is getting subsidies that are about twelve times as great as the tax preferences provided to the oil and gas sector  which has no mandates for consumers to buy gasoline or natural gas. Twenty-nine states have mandates requiring use of renewable energy. Otherwise you wouldn’t pay for it.

Congress has ended the corn ethanol subsidy, but the mandate for its use remains. Try to find an ethanol-free gas tank, and the EPA is striving to increase the amount of corn ethanol in gasoline. (Never mind the damage to your car).

I just detailed the new requirements for the oil and gas industry regarding offshore birds and mammals. A violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Eagle Protection Act can result in a fine of $250,000 and/or imprisonment for two years. According the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, some 440,000 birds per year are being killed by wind turbines, but the Obama administration has never prosecuted the wind industry for violating the law.  Oil and Gas industry people are regularly prosecuted.

The Department of Energy’s Advanced Technology Demonstration project is in addition to the wind production tax credit and means that wind producers can actually sell their energy to the grid for negative prices and still collect a profit from the taxpayers. It’s time to end the subsidy.

The assumption that government stepping in to help politically preferred technology will make that technology low cost and competitive — may not be operative in this sector at all. In every nation, as far as I can tell, when the subsidies end, the sector goes out of business, green jobs and all.

electricity_generation_by_source_2009_65



Our Thoughts and Prayers Are With The Families of Newtown, CT by The Elephant's Child
December 14, 2012, 5:18 pm
Filed under: Politics

There are no words that suffice for senseless violence. No comfort is enough. We speak of flawed human beings and original sin, yet never associate it with the possibility of this kind of thing, but it happens, and there is no understanding. How can one understand the killing of children? There are only questions and sorrow.



Can We Make Private Matters Private Once Again? by The Elephant's Child

OBAMALADYPARTS

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists announced their support last month for selling oral contraceptives over-the-counter without a prescription, in the United States. If approved by the federal government, this would take contraception out of politics, and put it back where it belongs, as a private matter.

The “War on Women” was always a complete lie. Republicans should never have allowed Democrats to demagogue the contraceptive issue and pretend that because Republicans rejected the idea that contraceptives should be a “free” health insurance benefit that therefore added a huge cost for taxpayers, that Republicans somehow opposed contraception.  Democrats are always on the lookout for anything they can translate into a bumper sticker, and that was an easy grab.

Women can now buy the morning-after pill over the counter without a prescription, but oral contraceptives require a prescription. If contraceptives are completely safe, then government should remove themselves from the issue. It is a private matter. The idea that Republicans opposed the use of contraception was a useful charge for Democrat propaganda, they may not want to give it up as an issue so easily. We’ll see.

I wonder how many low-information voters fell for the sleazy “Vote like your lady parts depend on it,” ploy?




Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 6,690 other followers

%d bloggers like this: