Filed under: Democrat Corruption, Economy, Energy, Environment | Tags: Departing Interview, EPA Director Lisa Jackson, Unwelcome Personal Outreach
Lisa Jackson, departing director of the Environmental Protection Agency, says she cringes whenever she is asked if President Barack Obama is serious about confronting climate change. Of course he is, she tells them, “The president has been really clear…I’m not sure how much clearer he could be.”
Still she was ever so pleased when the president cited the threats posed by climate change so prominently in his inaugural address. his nod to climate change served as a “satisfying coda to a tumultuous tenure marked by clashes with Republican lawmakers and agricultural communities.” And clashes with the courts, who slapped down the EPA for its overreach regularly.
Jackson’s deepest regret, she said, is that she failed to reach out to rural, often conservative regions of the United States. As a result, she said, opponents were able to generate politically damaging rumors of looming regulatory crackdowns. “If I were starting again, I would from day one make a much stronger effort to do personal outreach in rural America.” Jackson said. Had I known that these myths about everything from cow flatulence to spilled milk could be seen as ‘the EPA is coming to get you,’ I would have spent more time trying to inoculate against that.” Oh yes, those ignorant rural people clinging to their guns and their religion.
Her signature achievement, she said, was the so-called endangerment finding that greenhouse gases pose a danger to human health, a formal declaration that paved the way for the agency to write the carbon-cutting rules. Too bad that is all coming apart with more recent scientific findings.
Her tenure has been marked by repeated conflicts with scientific skeptics, and the courts. The IPCC is admitting that what small amount of warming there has been is caused by actions of the sun, not increasing carbon in the atmosphere. She has done a lot of damage to the economy, increased unemployment, damaged industries and the communities they supported, and all for nothing but a false ideology, and a power grab.
The top Swedish climate scientist, Dr. Lennart Bengstrom, just pointed out that the warming we have had is not noticeable. The warming we have had in the last 100 years is so small that if we didn’t have climate scientists to measure it, we wouldn’t have noticed.
Filed under: Capitalism, Democrat Corruption, Economy, Politics, Taxes | Tags: Lauffer Curve, Rational People Avoid Taxes, Taxing the Wealthy
Hiking taxes on the wealthy, who already pay the largest percentage of all taxes, in a misguided attempt to redistribute wealth usually results in redistributing the wealthy instead. France’s new socialist president Hollande raised taxes on “the rich” in France to 75%, which resulted in outrage and the departure of French actor Gerard Depardieu for the slightly friendlier tax climate of Belgium, and then some Russian state. Former President Nicolas Sarcozy has talked of moving to London, as many French citizens have already done.
In Britain, 2012 found that as a result of a millionaires tax that raised the rate to 50%, the total number of millionaire tax filers plunged to 6.000 from 16,000 in fiscal 2010-2011 from the year before. The new tax was intended to raise about £2.5 billion more revenue. In 2009-2010 British millionaires come up with about £13.4 billion, at the 50% rate, the tax yielded only £6.5 billion. The press assumed that 10,000 millionaires had left the country, but the rich do have lots of options. Cameron has dropped the 50% rate to 45%, which may account for the French moving to Britain.
Meanwhile, here at home, the message is that the only thing standing in the way of a grand bargain to reduce our growing national debt is Republican intransigence on taxes. With Republican agreement to raise taxes on those with incomes over $400,000, liberals seem to have decided there is no need to cut spending after all. Why am I not surprised?
“Suddenly the clear and present danger to the American economy isn’t that we’ll fail to reduce the deficit enough; it is, instead, that we’ll reduce the deficit too much,” warns Paul Krugman. All this worry about debt and deficits is “an entirely contrived crisis,” writes Robert Kuttner in the Huffington Post. After all, as the New York Times explains, “deficits are actually a good thing when the economy is deeply depressed, so deficit reduction should wait until the economy is stronger.” “So,” sums up Robert Reich, “can we please stop obsessing about future budget deficits? They’re distracting our attention from what we should be obsessing about — jobs and growth.”
The danger is that we’ll reduce the deficit too much? Huh? Deficits are a good thing when the economy is deeply depressed, so deficit reduction should wait until the economy is stronger? Majority leader Harry Reid gave a rare interview on Sunday. Before they reduce spending, Democrats want still another tax increase. A tax increase, he said is his price for adjusting the terms of the automatic spending cuts scheduled to hit on March 1. Revenues were rising sharply at the end of last year, even before the tax increase. According to the CBO report for December, individual income tax receipts were up $42 billion during October-December.
Even the CBO suggests that the increase may be due to some shifting income from 2013 into 2012, because people anticipate paying higher taxes in 2013. People behaving rationally in their own self-interest? Yes. They do. George Lucas sold Lucasfilm to Disney for $4.05 billion, by closing the sale in 2012, probably saved around $352 million in capital gains taxes. Larry Ellison, CEO of Oracle will save roughly $58 million in taxes because Oracle pushed three quarterly dividends scheduled for 2013 into 2012 to avoid higher taxes on dividends. Wal-Mart accelerated the January 2 dividend into December 27. The Walton family will pay a 15% tax on that dividend instead of 43.5% which will save them something like $95 million. Las Vegas Sands declared a special one-time 2012 dividend, which will save CEO Sheldon Adelson $336 million. Jack Daniels also declared a special dividend saving the Brown family around $68 million. Al Gore sold Current TV to Al-Jazeera, but it was probably worth so little that there wasn’t a significant capital gain, but it makes a lot of income 2012 income instead of 2013 income. This is quite legal and sensible. Americans are entitled to keep as much of their own money as they can.
Since 1990 California has lost nearly 3½ million residents, the majority of whom have moved to Texas, Nevada and Arizona. The out-migration is blamed on California’s “chronic economic adversity.”its population density, and “constant fiscal instability”, according to the Manhattan Institute and the infallible U-Haul Index.
The rich have more options than the rest of us, and they can employ better accountants as well. Good reason to try to become rich. Most Americans don’t envy “the rich,” they want to become rich or richer, and for more than two centuries that’s worked pretty well. Class warfare and redistribution of income have never produced growth and prosperity, not in America, nor anywhere else. It’ a misguided idea to try to make everyone equal, though demagogues can make it sound attractive.
Oddly though, Barack Obama’s efforts to redistribute income and demands for a society that is “fairer,” have mostly ended in enriching his already well-to-do supporters with taxpayer subsidies. The NAACP has begun to notice. Unemployment rates for black Americans continue to climb, and unemployment rates for black youth are off the charts. Obama talks a lot about “fairness.” His policies don’t produce anything of the kind.