American Elephants


Ex-NSA Chief Says the Risk of Terrorist Attack Is Growing by The Elephant's Child

Barack Obama came to office with a particular view of the world. Much of it was based on the idea that the Iraq War was based on a Bush lie, that it was “a dumb war” and everything the Bush administration did was wrong. It would be hard for even the most partisan Democrats to disagree, for the president was careful to blame every problem he faced as Bush’s fault. That’s on the record.

The War in Iraq was to be ended as swiftly as possible. The War in Afghanistan was viewed as a pursuit of Osama bin Laden to “bring him to Justice.” After bin Laden was located in Pakistan, Obama dithered for months before authorizing the raid. The extent of the delusion about radical Islam is demonstrated by the presidential promise to shut down Guantanamo. The president and his advisers were quite sure that most of the inmates were innocent, improperly imprisoned.

From the Cairo speech on, Obama has tried for a completely different approach to he Muslim world. He viewed America as a world bully, and he was going to be a friend to Islam instead. The word apparently went out to all in the administration that words such as  “terrorism,” “Islamist,” and “Jihad” were no longer to be used. Hillary explicitly directed that Boko Haram was not to be identified as a terrorist group, nor to mention that it was affiliated with al Qaeda—though Boko Haram attacks had been going on for years. Typically, when the organization came to public attention, the response was #hashtag signs, with pictures of the celebrity holding the signs.

The extent of the delusion about radical Islam is demonstrated by the presidential promise to shut down Guantanamo. The president and his advisers were quite sure that most of the inmates were innocent, and improperly imprisoned. They were astonished to find that not to be so.

After Bin Laden was killed, the administration assumed that al Qaeda was defeated and no longer a real threat. “GM is alive and OBL is dead” they crowed.

The man who knows better and more than anyone else says “the threat of attacks are growing, there are a lot more coming our way.” General Alexander, who directed the National Security Agency for eight years, also served as commander of U.S. Cyber Command and chief of the Pentagon’s Central Security Service said that high-tech surveillance has foiled numerous plots, but “we are at greater risk.”

“Look at the way al-Qaida networks from al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula, al-Qaida in the Islamic Magreb, and now in Syria, the al-Nusra front.”

Explicitly contradicting the White House line that a more diffuse al-Qaida is good news, Alexander cautioned, “you can say those are distant countries, but a lot of these groups are looking to attack the United States.”

Obama boasted to the General Assembly that “al Qaeda has splintered into regional networks and militias, which has not carried out an attack like 9/11,” downplaying current threats as being “to governments, diplomats, businesses and civilians across the globe.” But the new, less centralized al Qaeda grows in the absence of U.S. global power. The premature pullout  from Iraq and Afghanistan have encouraged the convulsions in the Middle East.

Thomas Joscelyn of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies in his testimony to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Terrorism, Nonproliferation, and Trade said:

The emergence of al Qaeda’s affiliates is no accident. Al Qaeda has always sought to push forward its agenda by working with, co-opting, or otherwise directing like-minded jihadist groups….As part of this Islamic army, bin Laden “enlisted groups from Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq, Oman, Algeria, Libya, Tunisia, Morocco, Somalia, and Eritrea.” The burgeoning al Qaeda network” also established cooperative but less formal relationships with other extremist groups from these same countries, from the African states of Chad, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, and Uganda, and from the Southeast Asian states of Burma, Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia. Al Qaeda also supported efforts in the Balkans, Central Asia, Chechnya, and the Philippines. …Al Qaeda pursued a”pattern of expansion through building alliances” and had laid the “groundwork for a true global terrorist network.”

Not exactly a confidence-building list. Our borders are more open, our actions more restrained, our language is more carefully moderate, and our response is immediate—we will all hold up little signs asking them to stop. That should keep us safe.

About these ads

2 Comments so far
Leave a comment

Maybe they can set up “No-Terrorism Zones”… I mean, that tactic has worked so well for the anti-gun crowd, hasn’t it? Just put up signs that read “No Terrorist Acts Allowed in This Area; Violaters will be fined $250.00 (as long as it doesn’t bother you)”. Put the signs up around playgrounds, schools, government buildings, and 2/3 the way up any buildings over 25 floors.

And put Biden in charge of the whole operation, so they know we mean business.

Comment by Lon Mead

I guess we’re all getting cynical.

Comment by The Elephant's Child




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 6,770 other followers

%d bloggers like this: