Filed under: Africa, Democrat Corruption, Domestic Policy, Health Care, Immigration, National Security, Politics, Progressivism | Tags: An Epidemic of Incompetence, Ebola Response Coordinator, Ron Klain Appointment
Correction: According to the White House, Ron Klain is not to be “the Ebola Czar.” He’s something else, and will report to Susan Rice. I do not find that encouraging. My impression is that Obama thinks Ebola is a political problem, probably created by Republicans, and he needs someone who is good at putting out political fires. If Susan Rice is an effective National Security adviser, It has not been evident in her public commentary nor in the Obama administration foreign policy.
President Obama is selling the new position as an “Ebola Response Coordinator” to restore order and manage operations across government. This would seem to require some familiarity with epidemiology and federal assets like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mr. Klain’s resume does not extend much beyond his stints as chief of staff to Vice Presidents Al Gore and Joe Biden , unless you count his job quarterbacking the Solyndra fiasco as no big deal. …
Then again, anonymous White House aides are telling the press corps that Mr. Klain’s partisan skills as a fixer are a credential. This may be the best indication to date of how Mr. Obama regards the dangers of the Ebola crisis, with risks to his own approval ratings near the top. Maybe three-star commander Valerie Jarrett can next prosecute the air war against Islamic State, if she isn’t already.
Mr. Klain’s resume is not encouraging.. He is said to be bright, but deeply involved in the backroom politics of the Democrat Party. He has no medical or health care background, but is closely associated with the Democracy Alliance and the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
The statement of purpose for the appointment says he is “to restore order and manage operations” across government. I don’t know what “order” he is to restore, but operations seem not to need managing, but learning. American hospitals are unprepared to deal with just one patient, and the results of not understanding the protocols is a multiplication of patients. Obama just doesn’t get it at all.
Filed under: Africa, Democrat Corruption, Domestic Policy, Health Care, Immigration, Islam, National Security, Politics, Progressivism, The United States | Tags: How Ebola Spreads, Politicizing the Non-Political, The Usefulness of Institutions
International agencies like the World Health Organization (WHO) run by the United Nations have become an international irrelevance. The failures of the Centers for Disease Control are disturbing, though they are supposed to be run by the government’s finest. Protocols supposedly put in place months ago were not observed, those exposed were “self monitoring” for symptoms. They weren’t supposed to be traveling on public transportation, and yet did. And it’s fairly clear that people possibly exposed were simply not taking quarantine seriously. Maybe seriously up until it was inconvenient, but then ignored.
There is a clear desire on the part of our government to prevent panic, but apparently little knowledge of how that is accomplished. Evidence that the agency has done their homework, and know what they are talking about is central. If people believe that you don’t know what you are talking about, your usefulness is over. Protocols that simply ask where people are coming from and take their temperature are, according to knowledgeable people, useless, since elevated temperatures are common and not diagnostic. The Wall Street Journal reports:
Since the 1990s, the WHO has gradually transformed itself from a disease fighter to what Dr. Chan calls “a normative agency” that makes international public health rules and promotes political goals like universal coverage. “That represented a very significant change over prior WHO policies,” says Laurie Garrett of the Council on Foreign Relations, who calls the WHO’s response to the epidemic “just shameful.”
Doctors without borders (Médicins Sans Frontiéres), the international aid agency, is recommended as having set the gold standard for Ebola safety, yet 16 of their staff members who have risked their lives in West Africa are infected, and nine have died. The U.S is providing $142 million in aid to the organization.
Paul Sperry reports at Investors that Muslim burial rituals may be to blame for much of the spread of Ebola. The body of an Ebola victim can be more dangerous in death than in life. 73% of Sierra Leone’s and 85% of Guinea’s people are Muslim. Islam is practiced by more than 13% of Liberians.
When a Muslim dies, family members do not turn to a funeral home or crematorium to take care of the body. Relatives personally wash the corpses of loved ones from head to toe. Several family members may participate in this posthumous bathing ritual, known as Ghusl.
Before scrubbing the skin with soap and water, family members press down on the abdomen to excrete fluids still in the body. A mixture of camphor and water is used for a final washing. Then, family members dry off the body and shroud it in white linens.Again, washing the bodies of the dead in this way is considered a collective duty for Muslims, especially in Muslim nations. Failure to do so is believed to leave the deceased “impure” and jeopardizes the faithful’s ascension into Paradise (unless he died in jihad; then no Ghusl is required). Before the body is buried, Muslims attending the funeral typically pass a common bowl for use in ablution or washing of the face, feet and hands, compounding the risk of infection.
Though these customs are prescribed by Sharia law, they’re extremely dangerous and should be suspended. Mosque leaders must step in to educate village Muslims about the dangers of interacting with corpses.
The practice has led to the spread of the disease. Families must be helped to understand why some practices cannot be done because they place others at risk.
Last month, Red Cross workers in Guinea were attacked by family members while trying to bury Ebola dead safely. In Sierra Leone, moreover, a family took Ebola-ridden bodies secured in body bags from the Red Cross, opened them up and exposed all members of the family to Ebola. They all contracted the disease.
The UN warns that the spread must be contained within 60 days or the infection rate can jump from 1,000 a week to 10,000 a week. Saudi Arabia, the center of Islam, has banned pilgrims from Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea.
President Obama argues that ban on travel would do more harm than good, because travelers “might go underground.” Now he’s talking about sending National Guard troops in addition to the 4.000 U.S. Military already there. The military had better take very great care of our troops, and see that none get infected.
Filed under: Democrat Corruption, Domestic Policy, Education, Health Care, Politics, Progressivism, Regulation | Tags: Michelle Obama's Lunch Program, Putting Everybody on a Diet, Reducing Childhood Obesity
American children have responded to Michelle Obama” healthy lunches by dumping their full trays into the garbage bins. School boards are demanding that the Obama administration relax the standards.
- 83.7 percent of school districts have seen an increase in plate waste.
- 81.8 percent had an increase in cost.
- 76.5percent saw a decrease in participation by students.
- 75 percent of school leaders want an increase in federal funding for school districts to comply with requirements.
- 60.3 percent want flexibility for school districts to improve their ability to provide good nutrition, without harm to other operations.
This is National School Lunch Week. The 2010 Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act calls for limits on fat, sugar and salt and a higher use of whole grains and veggies. The administration is quite sure it’s just not presenting them correctly. There are calorie limits for each meal, which I believe are the same for the 7 year-old and the 240 lb. football linebacker in high school. (That doesn’t seem possible).
Schools are urged to invite a legislator to lunch, or members of the press. There are special coloring sheets, word searches, crossword puzzles and more for the students to celebrate National School Lunch Week. Schools can win packets of stickers. There are tee shirts and aprons, posters and balloons and buttons.
Schools are urged to ask members of their staff if they would be interested in dressing up in different sports costumes for lunch. Add sports decorations to lunch lines. Rename some of your menu staples like ‘Touchdown Tacos, Fastball Fruit Salad, or Half-Time Hamburgers. Take pictures of your students enjoying lunchtime. Send them to the SNA Facebook page, but remember to get media release forms signed first. Ask local high school or college athletes to come in uniform to eat lunch with the younger kids.
That should do it.
ADDENDUM: Here’s another picture of a school lunch, as prescribed by Michelle Obama’s lunch program. Parents are furious. Some kids have the option of bringing a lunch from home , but many children depend on school lunches.This is pretty meager, unappetizing fare.
Filed under: Afghanistan, Democrat Corruption, Domestic Policy, Foreign Policy, Iran, Iraq, Liberalism, Media Bias, National Security, Politics, Progressivism, Statism, Terrorism, The Constitution, The United States | Tags: Opposition or Elimination?, The Party of Hate, Unhinged Democrats
The New York Times, the “paper of record,”is apparently astonished to find Republicans, who regularly criticize the president, showing concern for Secret Service failings in protecting the president and the White House. They assume that is merely a political ploy of some sort. They hate Republicans, want them permanently defeated, jailed, put in camps, killed, gone. They are unable to tolerate dissent, and believe that Republicans hate the president, and not only that, hate him because he is black. That is the theme they try to impress on blacks. If we don’t like the president’s policies, then we must wish him dead? Astonishing.
The headline today was “Showing Concern for the President, Even While Criticizing Him.” Even?
President Obama must be touched by all the concern Republicans are showing him these days. As Congress examines security breaches at the White House, even opposition lawmakers who have spent the last six years fighting his every initiative have expressed deep worry for his security.
“The American people want to know: Is the president safe?” Representative Darrell Issa of California, the Republican committee chairman who has made it his mission to investigate all sorts of Obama administration missteps, solemnly intoned as he opened a hearing into the lapses on Tuesday.
Yet it would not be all that surprising if Mr. Obama were a little wary of all the professed sympathy. Although the target of the legislative scrutiny is the Secret Service, not the president, the furor over security has left the White House on the defensive.
The American Interest noticed as well “GOP Taking Advantage of Events to Make WH Look Incompetent?”
Those horrible, mean, nasty Republicans are apparently “using” the revelations that the Secret Service isn’t being managed very well to create an impression of general incompetence at the White House. Here’s the money graph from the New York Times:
So unfair! Botch the public rollout of your most important domestic political program, fail to reform the VA after campaigning on a promise to do exactly that, and then make serial misjudgments about world affairs while Russia launches a war against Ukraine even as the U.S. goes back into Iraq—and those awful Republicans start a whisper campaign about your competence. Right before midterms, too! Have they no shame?
I am very critical of the president’s policies, and the Democrat Party’s policies. I believe they are responsible for the worst economic recovery ever. The recent recession was not the worst recession since the Great Recession of the 1930s. It ended, officially, in 2009. ObamaCare is a badly conceived disaster. Immigration is an unfolding disaster. Federal agencies are corrupt and show no signs of improvement. Foreign policy is one misjudgment after another. I think Obama was unprepared for the office and mistook his ability to sway audiences with his speeches for qualification for the highest office. But I don’t hate him personally. I don’t wish him harm. I don’t know of any Republicans who do. I oppose his ideology with all my being, but he is the president, and I respect the office.
Democrats hated George W. Bush and wanted him dead, because he was a Republican and because he was president. They hated everything about him. They said so. They hated the way he walked. They hated the way he talked. They hated his “squint.” They hated that he was from Texas. Doubt me? Here is the evidence, if you have forgotten.