Filed under: Politics, Domestic Policy, Education, Health Care, Freedom, Regulation | Tags: Michelle Obama, School Lunches, Anti-Childhood Obesity
It seems odd. but there are fads in issues as well as fashions. When’s the last time you heard a rant about childhood obesity? The First Lady took that one on as her personal project. First Ladies apparently must have a “project.” Lady Belle Johnson was enthusiastic about wildflowers, Laura Bush promoted childhood reading, Nancy Reagan took on drug abuse. I cannot remember what if anything was Hillary’s project. I remember that she was quite determined to be a “co-president” along with her husband — which didn’t go over well with the public at all.
Michelle Obama took on childhood obesity as her special project, and supported new rules that would restrict calories and limit portion sizes in school meals. Her ideas suffered from the same problems as her husband’s. “One size fits all” didn’t fit the nation’s school children. The calorie restrictions and smaller portions left kids who were active sports participants hungry. The food police rejected lunches prepared at home that did not fit the new USDA guidelines, making many parents furious. There was little recognition of the foods that kids like. If you have ever visited a school lunch room at lunchtime, you will have seen the enormous waste as kids throw away the foods that they don’t like.
I can sympathize. I still remember scraping the tomato aspic off my plate into the napkin in my lap while a confederate distracted the nun’s attention. I don’t know if she was fooled, but we all hated tomato aspic, and probably all still do till this day.
The modified meals, which took effect starting with the 2012 school year, were aimed to limit fat and salt, curb portion sizes and boost fruit and vegetable servings. Under the guidelines, half of breads and other grain-based foods offered must contain whole grains until the start of the 2014 school year, when all such foods must be whole-grain.
Schools that adopted the changes got more money back from the federal government, in part to offset the higher prices of “healthier foods.” Read that as the heavy hand of government will direct what your child eats, or you will pay! Children cannot possibly make proper choices without government control.
There is some question about governmental estimates of obesity and overweight. The guidelines may be all one size, but kids aren’t. Some kids are small and skinny by nature. Others are stocky, but not fat. Obesity estimates seem to have come from Body Mass Index (BMI) guesstimate or measurements which were not meant to serve such a purpose. Some kids get their growth early, and tower over others who are the same age.
Over time, those who produce school lunches have learned a lot about what kids like — pizza for example. Pizza can be healthy food, and a good way to get the vegetables down. The standards have not been ended, but “relaxed.” Kids will get more meat and increased weekly maximum amounts for grains and meat alternatives. School districts can serve larger portions without penalty.
The other part of the equation is recess and activity. For a while, at least, competition was out, as were competitive sports. It was thought that having ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ was bad for the kids self-esteem, which ended up reducing the activity in recess. That last sentence in the previous paragraph should cause any parent major anxiety. “School districts can serve larger portions without penalty.” How did we get here?
Filed under: Democrat Corruption, Freedom, Health Care, Junk Science, Liberalism, Statism | Tags: Federal Control of School Lunches, Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act, Michelle Obama
CBS News reported:
Speaking at Monday’s signing ceremony for the “Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act”–a law that will subsidize and regulate what children eat before school, at lunch, after school, and during summer vacations in federally funded school-based feeding programs–First Lady Michelle Obama said of deciding what American children should eat: “We can’t just leave it up to the parents.
There they go with the clever naming. The poor kids were starving to death before Michelle arrived to see that they eat their veggies. How did what our schools serve for lunch become a federal concern? It’s” For the Children.”
We have school boards locally elected by the people of the district. We have a district Superintendent of Schools and a State Superintendent of Schools.
The times I’ve visited school at lunchtime, the amount of good food going into the trash cans was amazing. And I can remember when we were served tomato aspic, as a healthy choice for 9 or 10 year-olds. It was someone’s job to distract the teacher in charge so we could all scrape the disgusting stuff off into napkins in our laps, which we deposited in the trash. They never caught on that all our plates were suddenly empty at the same time. Or maybe they hated the stuff too.
No birthday celebrations, no bake sales, no money-raising efforts. Is this an end to Girl Scout cookies? Out with the vending machines, and apples and carrots for everyone. I think parents have a right to decide all by themselves what they want their children to eat, or not eat, without the help of the federal government.
Filed under: Freedom, Humor, News of the Weird | Tags: Beer, Michelle Obama, Nanny Government
Texas chef invents deep-fried beer.
Michelle Obama is undoubtedly already working to ban it.