Filed under: Domestic Policy, Foreign Policy, Politics | Tags: Bill Clinton, Debunking Liberal Lies, Democrat Corruption, Democrat Demagogues, Democrat Lies/Dirty Tricks, Dianne Feinstein, Hillary Clinton, John Murtha
It looks like Dianne Feinstein is guilty of corruption far worse than anything Republicans have been accused of, let alone done. I’m certainly not saying Republicans guilty of corruption should not pay the consequences—they absolutely should, and most importantly, they have—but where are the libtards calling for investigations into Dianne Feinstein’s alleged criminal misdeeds??
This is precisely how you tell which party is more corrupt. Corruption exists in both parties, but only Republicans do anything about it—they don’t tolerate it and force anyone guilty of it out of the party.
Democrats on the other hand cover it up, refuse to investigate, circle the wagons to defend their corrupt members, and then promote them.
William Jefferson was caught red-handed with $90,000 cash in his freezer—he is still in congress, he was re-elected for crying out loud.
Jack Murtha was video taped meeting to discuss taking a bribe. The FBI has identified him as an “unindicted co-conspiritor” in the ABSCAM scandal. He still sits in congress, also re-elected even after the video came out.
Jim McDermott was found guilty in civil court of violating the civil rights of Rep. John Boehner and ordered to pay $800,000 in fines—Democrats refuse to allow his case to come before the ethics committee, and of course he still sits in congress (re-elected).
Hillary Clinton’s campaign was found guilty in court of illegally hiding millions in donations. Having not disclosed these donations as they are required to do by federal law, Hillary was able to cheat in the election by flooding the airwaves with ads at the last minute, paid for by money the Republicans had no idea she had, and so had spent all their legally reported money. In other words, Hillary committed big time campaign-finance fraud to cheat in an election—and yet not only does she still sit in the Senate, she is the front-runner for the Democrat presidential nomination.
And in the interest of brevity, I wont go into the non-stop corruption that defined Bill and Hillary’s tenure in the White House (not to mention the Governors mansion in Arkansas.) I’m sure I will cover it all in detail in some future post.
And that is only the very tip of the tip of the iceberg of Democrat corruption. Lets stick with the latest revelation, that Dianne Feinstein is quite possibly the biggest war profiteer in congressional history—and other than the Hill, the mainstream media has been deafeningly silent on the matter, and the Democrat led congress won’t even mention it, let alone investigate it.
And thats precisely because, while Republicans may have a few corrupt members here and there that they have drummed out, the Democrat party is deeply corrupt to its core.
It makes perfect sense that Democrats are so thoroughly corrupt: What else do you expect from a party that never holds its corrupt members accountable, but instead keeps them, defends them, re-elects and promotes them?
If the inferences finally coming out about what she did while on Milcon prove true, she may be on the way to morphing from a respected senior Democrat into another poster child for congressional corruption.
The problems stem from her subcommittee activities from 2001 to late 2005, when she quit. During that period the public record suggests she knowingly took part in decisions that eventually put millions of dollars into her husband’s pocket — the classic conflict of interest that exploited her position and power to channel money to her husband’s companies.
In other words, it appears Sen. Feinstein was up to her ears in the same sort of shenanigans that landed California Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham (R) in the slammer. Indeed, it may be that the primary difference between the two is basically that Cunningham was a minor leaguer and a lot dumber than his state’s senior senator.
3 Comments so far
Leave a comment