Filed under: Developing Nations, Foreign Policy, News, Terrorism, Uncategorized | Tags: Piracy on the High Seas, Saudi Oil Tanker, Somali Pirates
Pirates have seized a Saudi-owned supertanker leaded with more then $100 million worth of crude oil off the coast of Kenya — the largest ship ever hijacked according to U.S. Navy officials. Somali pirates have become increasingly brazen, but this is the first time they have attacked a fully laden oil tanker. “This is unprecedented” the International Herald Tribune quotes a spokesman for the Fifth Fleet, Lt. Nathan Christensen. “Its the largest ship that we’ve seen pirated. It’s three times the size of an aircraft carrier.” The supertanker, the Sirius Star, was hijacked more than 450 nautical miles southeast of Mombasa, Kenya, far to the south of previous attacks. Pirates range over an area from the Gulf of Aden to the Kenyan coast, more than a million square miles. Most ships do not have heavy security, while the pirates are fast and well armed. And most are taken for ransom. Shipping firms are usually prepared to pay, for the sums demanded are still low compared with the value of the ships and their cargo. This seems like a remote crime — piracy in 2008? But the International Chamber of Commerce keeps track of Commercial Crimes. Here is a map of piracy incidents just in 2008. Once it was the Barbary Coast pirates, but now apparently everything old is new again.
Filed under: Economy, Energy, Global Warming, Science/Technology | Tags: Environment, Green Politics, United Kingdom
England is having a bad time with their Green movement. The Greens have worked for over 40 years to undermine the British economic system and to replace it with a Green autocracy that can control the British population. Uninvestigated, it all sounded so — caring, and made a good topic of conversation for dinner parties. When it meant just paying a little more for ‘organic’ veggies, or separating the trash into separate bins, it offered a small noble feeling of doing one’s part.
They, the Greens, pretty much got away with it. At least until the economic crisis hit and people with calculators began looking at what things would actually cost. An excellent example is recycling in the UK. Most of this process has been driven by edicts from the EU — it is the moral thing to do, and you will recycle. But it seems that there is no demand, none whatsoever, for recycled waste. The British paper, The Observer, reported that:
Huge waste mountains could be sited on military bases under emergency plans to protect Britain’s recycling revolution from the economic downturn.
Local authorities have requested government permission to site rubbish dumps on Ministry of Defense land in order to stockpile growing amounts of recyclable waste for which there is no use and no market.
The Observer is the quintessential right thinking newspaper. Recycling is good. Therefore we must continue the recycling revolution no matter what the costs. Can something be “recyclable” if it has no use, and if there is no market at all for it?
A second tactic is the eternal battle against an evil threat. Global warming has become the perpetual threat that demands every sacrifice — democracy, liberty, the destruction of free markets and the establishment of the “Ministry of Truth.” It will be staffed with an army of bureaucrats who will rewrite history, eliminating the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period, as well as circulating pictures of drowning polar bears and melting glaciers.
The third tactic is the adoption of Green bureaucratic language. Global warming becomes “climate change’. “Sustainability” becomes the buzz-word of the day. “Sustainable development” can be encouraged to build wind farms, to bolster the quest for funds, or to pass undesirable laws. It can also be used to prevent development, block growth and to conjure up a return to an imagined, usually rural, Utopia.
Greens come in many guises, and range from the caring but ill-informed to the totally loony. Their prescriptions need to be based in observed science and real economics. That shouldn’t be asking too much.
You are being fed a parcel of lies. Pay attention, read up, and investigate further. Don’t just swallow.
(h/t Climate Change Fraud)
Filed under: Election 2008, News the Media Doesn't Want You to Hear, Politics | Tags: Democrat, Democrat lies, Ignorance, Propaganda
A new Zogby poll confirms what many of us knew: Obama won the election because of uninformed, misinformed and ignorant supporters.
A documentary, “Media Malpractice…How Obama Got Elected,” addressing the “mainstream” news media’s complicity in keeping voters ignorant and misinformed is in the works. In this preview, the film-maker interviews 12 Obama supporters, randomly selected by another Obama supporter. The results would be funny if they weren’t so frightening:
According to the Zogby poll, a whopping 57.4% of Obama supporters believe erroneously that Republicans are currently in control of congress. The most unpopular congress ever, for good reason, and well over half of Obama voters are exactly wrong about who is controlling it.
And so Obama supporters give even more power to the party that has presided over our current economic collapse. Its not a surprise, but it doesn’t make it any less depressing.
Other results from the poll:
81.8% could NOT correctly say Joe Biden quit a previous campaign because of plagiarism (25% chance by guessing)
82.6% could NOT correctly say that Barack Obama won his first election by getting opponents kicked off the ballot (25% chance by guessing)
88.4% could NOT correctly say that Obama said his policies would likely bankrupt the coal industry and make energy rates skyrocket (25% chance by guessing)
56.1% could NOT correctly say Obama started his political career at the home of two former members of the Weather Underground (25% chance by guessing).
Only 13.7% failed to identify Sarah Palin as the person on which their party spent $150,000 in clothes
Only 6.2% failed to identify Palin as the one with a pregnant teenage daughter
And 86.9 % thought that Palin said that she could see Russia from her “house,” even though that was Tina Fey who said that!!
Only 2.4% got at least 11 correct.
Only .5% got all of them correct. (And we “gave” one answer that was technically not Palin, but actually Tina Fey)