American Elephants

What We Don’t Know and the Precautionary Principle. by The Elephant's Child

This dandy little diagram came. I believe, from Dr. Roy Spencer, who tries to emphasize what we know about the climate.  The great vast part of the circle of climate knowledge is what we don’t know that we don’t know about climate. (see Donald Rumsfeld)

That small bright blue wedge represents the sum total of our knowledge. It is on this small percentage of knowledge that we and other western industrialized countries have decided to transform our economies. We have just learned that the fabled “greenhouse effect” and the vast dangers of the earth heating up because of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are largely hooey, but billions and billions have been spent to reduce the amount of CO2 escaping into the atmosphere. Why?

It is on that basis that the president has attempted to keep us from using our own natural resources of oil and gas by refusing to issue drilling permits, by putting the coastlines of the eastern United States, the eastern Gulf of Mexico, and the west coast and the coast of Alaska off limits to drilling for the next seven years.  Those efforts have contributed significantly to the soaring 9.2% unemployment rate. The administration is busily choosing winners and losers, something governments don’t know how to do.

It is on the basis of that small blue wedge that the president is promoting electric cars, which Americans don’t want, and doubling CAFE standards in a move that automakers cannot meet.

Master Resource notes that:

The U.S. Department of Energy’s Loan Programs Office (LPO) is offering guaranteed financing to First Solar Inc. for three solar panel projects in California for $4.5 billion.  Carefully analyzed, these projects do little to fund efficient energy production or create permanent jobs.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) notes that in 2010 only 1% of energy consumption was from solar power. Yet 15 out of the 23 generation LPO projects have been for solar power plants. The cost of these 15 projects has been $16 billion–40 percent of the total cost of all guaranteed projects.

A previous $1.6 billion guarantee for a solar panel project, Bright Source Energy, produced 1,000 temporary construction jobs and 86 permanent jobs. That’s $18.6 million per permanent job.

And in another piece:

The U.S. wind market, which has relied on public funding since its inception in the 1970s, has a long trail of false expectations and broken promises.

The wind industry has promised to meet U.S. electricity needs, claiming that wind power could supply 20% of all needs by 1995.  Today wind energy delivers about 2% of the U.S. electricity market.Promises of reduced costs, improved performance and job creating have proved false.  It seems that wind will perpetually be an “infant industry,” perpetually demanding support, and the public has not done enough to create a market for it.

Billions and billions, all based on a very small amount of knowledge about a very large subject.  Possibly we should consider that we can adapt to such changes as we have seen. And that we simply don’t know enough to be investing so much in what may be absolutely futile.

This is government by Precautionary Principle.  It states that if an action or a policy has a suspected risk of causing harm to the public or to the environment, in the absence of scientific proof that the policy or action is harmful, the burden of proof  that it is not harmful falls on those taking the action.  This is nonsense, and falls in the same category as proving a negative.

We are leaving Iraq and Afghanistan in 2014, therefore there will be no more wars and we can cut billions from the defense budget, because we simply don’t need all those planes and ships and silly equipment.  Or you can make up your own example of unfortunate administration thinking.

They’re Coming to Take You Away! Ha Ha! They’re Coming to Take You Away! by The Elephant's Child

FREDRICKSBURG, Va. (WUSA) — Eleven year-old aspiring veterinarian ,Skylar Capo, sprang into action the second she learned that a baby woodpecker in her Dad’s backyard was about to be eaten by the family cat.

“I’ve just always loved animals,”said Skylar Capo. “I couldn’t stand to watch it be eaten.”

She couldn’t find the woodpecker’s mother , so she brought the baby bird to her own mother Alison Capo, who agreed to take it home.  “She was just going to take care of it for a day or two, make sure it was safe and uninjured, and then she was going to let it go,”

On the way home they stopped at a Lowes in Fredricksburg and brought the bird inside because of the heat.  That’s when they were confronted by a fellow shopper who said she worked for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. She pulled out a badge.

The problem was that the woodpecker is a protected species under the Federal Migratory Bird Act.  Therefore, it is illegal to take or transport a baby woodpecker.  The Capos said they had no idea. As soon as they got home, they opened the cage, the bird flew away, and they reported it to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.  “They said that’s great, that’s exactly what we want to see. We thought we had done everything we could possibly do. ”

About two weeks later the same woman showed up at the Capo house.  This time, accompanied by a state trooper.  Capo refused to accept a citation, but was later mailed a notice to appear in U.S. District Court for unlawfully taking a migratory bird.  She has also been slapped with a $535 fine.  If convicted she could face a year in jail.

After a little publicity, the Service determined that no further action was warranted and the ticket should not have been issued.

The amount of excessive regulation that needs to be undone is a little frightening.

(h/t: Moonbattery)

%d bloggers like this: