Filed under: Domestic Policy, Law, News, Uncategorized | Tags: Guns for the Police, Sorting out the Day's News, The Firearms Debate
Let’s see. If I understand the current hysteria over guns and bullets, assault weapons, scary looking attachments like scopes and magazines of assorted sizes and how many bullets a magazine may contain, the liberal argument is that only the police need guns. And in the meantime, a former police officer has issued a manifesto to kill police officers in the Los Angeles area.
Christopher Jordan Dorner, an ex-LAPD police officer is the main suspect in three separate murders. A vehicle that matched the description of Dorner’s truck was driving down the road, but was delivering newspapers. Two older women were delivering papers when police officers opened fire. One woman was shot in the back, the other in the hand. Both are expected to survive.
Another person was shot while driving a pickup truck after Torrance police arrived at the scene. Reports of his injuries weren’t clear, but he is considered in good condition—except for being shot by police officers.
Perhaps they should rethink that idea that only the police need guns.
At the bottom of the piece under “RECOMMENDED STORIES’
—Convicted Ohio man apologizes to family of slain daughter-in-law strangled, put in septic tank.
—Pennsylvania mistrial declared when man’s prosthetic eye pops out on witness stand.
2 Comments so far
Leave a comment