Filed under: Capitalism, Democrat Corruption, Domestic Policy, Economy, Environment, Freedom, Health Care, History, Politics, The United States | Tags: The American Diet, The Food Bureaucracy, The Food Police
The trouble is, somebody gets a bright idea about something or another, and first thing you know the federal government has created an agency or bureau to deal with it. In this particular case, the bureaucracy was already there — it was just a matter of expanding their jurisdiction. Obama thought as long as we were doing new dietary guidelines, they should address his fallback ‘good thing’ — addressing the environment:
U.S. dietary guidelines, the government’s benchmark for balanced nutrition, have long advised Americans to eat dark, leafy greens. Now, there is another way the standards could be going green.
A panel of nutrition experts recruited by the Obama administration to help craft the next set of guidelines, to be issued this year, said in long-awaited recommendations Thursday that the government should consider the environment when deciding what people should eat.
The environmental focus means endorsing a diet that included limited amounts of meat and more plant-based foods, while encouraging consumption of seafood whose stocks are not endangered. The market may be accomplishing that without Obama’s help, the price of beef continues to climb, and California’s concern for the comfort and well-being of chickens — legislating larger cages, means that the cost of chickens and eggs will go up as well. One of the major environmental concerns seems to be cattle effluent which they believe contributes too much CO² to the atmosphere, but the worry now refers to burps, rather than the other end.
I do not now, nor never have, posted a U.S. Department of Agriculture poster on healthy eating, whether a “my plate” contemporary version, multiple food pyramids, nor earlier, kindlier “Guides to Good Eating.” Nor do I know of anyone who has, nor anyone who takes the slightest interest in what the federal government has to say about the proper food to eat according to self-proclaimed experts.
I think the entire department can safely be abolished, the bureaucrats released to go annoy someone else, and lots of money saved for taxpayers. They have always been wrong about everything anyway. Butter is good. Fat is fine, bacon is fine, fruit is all sugar anyway, coffee is actually good for you, don’t worry about cholesterol which was prominent in their very first dietary guidelines issued by a U.S. Senate committee in 1977, though any scientific evidence linking cholesterol to heart disease was and is inconclusive. Oh yes, salt may be good for you after all.
“Organic” in foods refers only to the process of growing food, and excludes chemical fertilizer, though animal manure is fine. Same for pesticides, no chemicals, but you can use the extremely poisonous pyrethrum based pesticides. Organic is only a marketing ploy, and there is no nutritional benefit, nor are organic foods healthier or safer in any way. They will be about 30% more expensive.
Steven Malanga has a nice history of the food guidelines here.The previous guidelines were much more dependent on carbohydrates, which have had the effect of making more Americans fat, and giving more American diabetes, so perhaps someone is paying attention. More proof that they have always been wrong. Abolish the food bureaucracy, abolish the food police, shut down the “health food stores” and eat what you please. And never pay any attention to those silly little ads at the bottom of the page saying “never eat this one food,” or conversely “this one food can…” The American people have enormous good sense and do just fine — uncontrolled and unregulated.
Leave a Comment so far
Leave a comment