American Elephants


President Obama’s Legacy In 9 Simple Charts From The Federal Reserve. by The Elephant's Child

CP6eZ_CWsAAyWVe.jpg large(Click to enlarge)

Take your time, read the small print. The nine charts do not, of course cover everything. There’s still the Iran Deal, the mess in Syria, the Taliban’s success in Afghanistan, excessive regulation. It would be easy to chart another nine, and then another. But it is a start on an all too real record. Some Legacy!

ADDENDUM: I don’t usually go back and add to previous posts, particularly those from several years ago. The date that the post was written is at the top. This one was written in September of 2015, during the campaign for the 2016 election. The data are from many different federal offices, mostly Commerce, listed on the second line at the top of each chart. There are 12 Federal Reserve districts, each with a Federal Reserve Bank. If I make mistakes, I will struggle to set them right, and I try to check the data carefully.  Unfortunately this is indeed the record of Barack Obama.

 


6 Comments so far
Leave a comment

Reblogged this on Utopia – you are standing in it!.

Like

Comment by Jim Rose

[…] President Obama's Legacy In 9 Simple Charts From The Federal Reserve. […]

Like

Pingback by The Mounting List of Obama Administration Scandals: | American Elephants

Great faked graphics w/ phony data … The real Federal Reserve charts appear at the Federal Reserve of St. Louis website https://fred.stlouisfed.org

Like

Comment by Carlene Hill Byron

You apparently did not notice that the post was from 2015, over a year ago, and I don’t know how current the charts were then. Your link, also to the St. Louis Fed, isn’t even on the same subject, and irrelevant. Sloppy.

Like

Comment by The Elephant's Child

Methinks the Elephant doth protest too much. I’ll take “sloppy” over intentional deception any day.

Like

Comment by Carlene Hill Byron

How about relevant, Ms. Byron? The charts you linked to were graphing entirely different data. As for your claim of “intentional deception”, I can only assume you have proof.

Like

Comment by Lon Mead




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s



%d bloggers like this: