Filed under: Bureaucracy, Domestic Policy, Law, Politics, Regulation, The United States | Tags: FDR and Wilson, Medicine and Bad Medicine, POTUS
At Powerline, Steven Hayward addressed the difference between “political” medicine and real medicine:
From Russell Baker’s review of Joseph Lelyveld’s new book His Final Battle: The Last Months of Franklin Roosevelt in the current issue of the New York Review of Books:
Everybody seemed aware that the president had a medical problem of some sort, but nobody knew precisely what it was. Political medicine differs from medical science because news of a physical sickness may quickly produce a terminal political ailment.The usual treatment in FDR’s day was to lie about it, and if that was impractical, to pretend it was merely a trifling seasonal ailment, a touch of bronchial discomfort perhaps, left over from last winter’s touch of flu. “Good as new in a day or two” was a common prognosis from doctors too scared to speak truth to ailing politicians.
Gosh, why does that sound familiar just now…
Leave a Comment so far
Leave a comment