Filed under: Economy, Education, Energy, Environment, Health Care, Iraq, Terrorism | Tags: Bad Ideas, Democrat Demagogues, Office of the President-elect
Immediately after the election, the Office of the President-elect posted their agenda at Change.gov. Then it quickly disappeared and the website displayed only the following:
President-elect Obama and Vice President-elect Biden have developed innovative approaches to challenge the status quo in Washington and to bring about the kind of change America needs.
The Obama Administration has a comprehensive and detailed agenda to carry out its policies. The principal priorities of the Obama Administration include: a plan to revive the economy, to fix our health care, education, and social security systems, to define a clear path to energy independence, to end the war in Iraq responsibly and finish our mission in Afghanistan, and to work with our allies to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, among many other domestic and foreign policy objectives.
Well, today it’s all back, so you can read the whole thing should you so desire. I find this little paragraph sufficiently troubling. It is still ‘I will stop the rising of the seas’ stuff. These eight priorities would occupy, and have occupied, the presidencies of at least eight different administrations, and even more.
Presidents have been trying to improve the education of our children, for example, ever since the Eisenhower administration at least, and no one has ever been willing to tackle the root of the problems. President Bush, with No Child Left Behind, has made an effort to let parents and schools know how their kids are doing compared to the rest of the nation, and had some distinct success in improvement as a result.
Obama is going to fix everything, specifically by paying for everything. Community College? Free. Afterschool programs, sure. Preschool programs, of course. Get the kids early— “The Zero to Five” program. Support good schools and close low-performing charter schools. Make Math and Science education a priority — that’s the one every administration has done, to little effect, but hope springs eternal.
I want to give Obama every chance, yet the economic crisis suggests that raising taxes and major government spending are clearly not the best approach. Obama apparently wants to model his program after FDR’s disastrous approach to the Great Depression, by raising taxes, canceling free trade agreements, instituting all sorts of government make-work programs, and building ‘infrastructure’. It is just that sort of thing that extended the depression into the 1950s in many parts of the country.
Obama is a climate hysteric. That is, he firmly believes that global warming is a problem rather than a natural part of the earth’s constant warming and cooling. He believes that we can actually do something to stop the earth from warming if we just shut down all the nasty fossil fuels and switch to wind and solar energy. Of course since global warming has stopped in the last ten years, perhaps he can just take credit for that and not mess with the rest.
He believes firmly, as do the environmental organizations to which he owes so much, that we can create millions of “green jobs”. But if you destroy an existing job in the oil industry in order to create one in a so-called ‘green’ industry — you have done nothing for the economy at all. There is simply no evidence that the so-called “renewable energy” producers can replace our dependence on fossil fuels in the foreseeable future.
There is an absence of understanding of what the free market is, why it works, and why you ignore it at your peril. They’re blaming it on “deregulation”, in the false notion that the government just wasn’t regulating enough.
There is a lot of “hope” here, but the agenda is more than a little short on the specifics that might promote some confidence. There is a lack of understanding of history, our history, and a lack of understanding of the programs and policies of past presidents and what they accomplished and where they failed. I find it troubling.
Filed under: Economy, Liberalism, Politics | Tags: Bad Ideas, Democrat Demagogues, Taxes
During the presidential election campaign, some voters were startled to hear for the first time that at least a third of Americans pay no income taxes whatsoever.
The Tax Foundation notes that in 2006, 45,600,000 tax filers paid no income tax at all. Under today’s law, in 2009 47.000,000 (representing probably 96 million individuals) will pay no income tax.
The Foundation maintains that under Obama’s plan 63,000,000 filers will pay no taxes or 44% of all returns. So pretty close to 1/2 of Americans will pay the taxes for the other half as well as themselves.
Obama said repeatedly that 95% of Americans would get a tax cut under his plan. Economist Alan Reynolds, when asked where they got that figure, said simply “They made it up.”
In 2006, IRS figures show that the top 10% of all filers ($109,000 and over) paid 71% of all taxes.
I’m inclined to think that everyone should pay some taxes, and participate in our society. No matter how compassionate you feel towards those who make less in our society, it is not healthy for only a handful of people to pay the taxes for the rest of us.
Now a new report from the OECD that our taxes are the most progressive in the world — we already collect the most from the wealthiest 10% and extract the most compared to their share of the country’s income.
Will Obama continue with his plans to tax the top earners still more? Most economists are suggesting that the current crisis is not a time to raise taxes — any taxes. Yet he seems to be determined to go after those he categorizes as “the rich.”