Filed under: Energy, Environment, Global Warming | Tags: Bird Deaths, Ideology, Oil Spills, Renewable Energy
Whenever there is an oil spill on the water, American media are filled with photos and videos of oil soaked birds. The coverage prompts the self-appointed environmental defenders of wildlife to erupt in righteous fury, wringing their hands and blaming the greedy oil companies and blaming careless people of the West for demanding more and more energy so they can fuel their enormous RVs and yachts in crimes against nature.
Fossil fuels are evil, and the alternative is “clean” renewable energy sources like wind and solar energy. Wind and solar energy are natural and sustainable. And solar energy produces less than 1% of our electricity needs, requires 24 hour 7days a week backup from a conventional power plant. If the subsidies vanished, so would solar energy. But the birds, those beautiful birds, dying from filthy fossil fuels!
In the most recent U.S. oil spill off the coast of California, 161 birds died, as of the latest count. Truly sad.
Estimates for bird deaths by wind turbine run from 100,000 a year (The National Research Council), to 300,000 (American Bird Conservancy). Bloomberg News put the toll at 573,000 birds in 2012. That’s for wind turbines. The estimate for birds roasted by the Ivanpah solar-thermal plant in the Mojave Desert are — one every two minutes — or roughly 28,000 birds killed in a year. Ivanpah focuses the heat from 170,000 mirrors on three 450-foot tall towers generating heat up to 800°. The songbird numbers are hard to estimate for they simply go up in a puff of smoke. The government chooses to look the other way, and ignore laws about raptor deaths because global warming. They gave their lives in a noble cause — renewable energy.
To be fair, the 2010 BP oil spill did substantial damage to wildlife in the region. The Fish and Wildlife Service reported 2,202 “visibly oiled” dead birds were collected within the Deepwater Horizon/ BP incident impact area. Big oil spills, however, are fairly rare, and birds chopped by turbines or roasted by solar mirrors are continuous.
The article in Investors claimed the biggest cause of bird deaths was cats. They said “one study claims that cats are responsible for killing about 2.4 billion birds a year.” I’m suspicious of that statistic. I’ve always had cats (and dogs, bunnies and horses) and I can’t remember but one time I found a bird carcase around the house. One cat was death on garden snakes, and had a bad habit of bringing them into the house and turning them loose. She loosed one on the stairs and I nearly broke a leg when I almost stepped on it.
Filed under: Democrat Corruption, Intelligence, Latin America, Law, Politics, Terrorism, The Constitution | Tags: Executed Mexican Nationals, Ideology, Mexico's Drug Wars
Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi tried valiantly to claim that nasty Republicans were only attacking poor Attorney General Eric Holder because he was attempting to righteously prevent nasty Republicans from keeping poor black Minority members from voting by requiring them to prove to polling officials who they are by showing a picture ID. I don’t know where you could sell that whopper, and have it believed. Perhaps in San Francisco.
We also have learned that panicky Democrats have hauled out Watergate, and attempted to claim that was worse. There were NO dead bodies in Watergate, it was an ill-advised break-in to the opposition’s party headquarters. And that was wrong. But the Watergate scandal was about the attempt to cover it up. There were still NO dead bodies. The Court determined that “Executive Privilege” cannot be used if the assertion is shielding wrongdoing. The DoJ must provide a compelling rationale for each assertion.
Fast and Furious, the gunrunning scandal, depended on dead bodies for success. If the scheme was to work, people had to be killed, and that is indefensible.
Filed under: Health Care, Law, National Security, Taxes | Tags: Ideology, Incompetence, Inexperience
We have a country mired in financial crisis, with out-of-control spending, escalating national debt and escalating deficits. On the international scene, we are fighting one war and winding down a second one — trying to protect a fledgling democracy as it proudly holds free elections.
We have had a further terrorist attack on this country, fortunately unsuccessful. The country that funds, trains, and foments almost all of the Islamist terrorism in the world is actively seeking nuclear weapons.
So what has our president chosen as the most important question to be addressed in his first year? Reforming the health care system that is the envy of the world, by convincing people that poor Americans who are lacking health insurance are dying in the streets, the victims of voracious insurance companies. People in Europe and Canada actually believe this blatant nonsense.
“Repeal and Replace” is the rallying cry.
I am convinced that economics will accomplish what neither politics nor common sense has been able to reach in the vanity and conceit of the political class. Despite the gloating and huzzahs of the Democrats, there is more to reforming health care than just saying “Make it so!” In spite of all the speeches, economic reality is going to rear its ferocious head. ObamaCare has always carried the seeds of its own destruction. It’s not going to be pretty.