American Elephants


Is It Time For The Federal Government to Stop Telling You What to Eat? by The Elephant's Child

mixed selection of fruit and vegetables

For 35 years the federal government has been issuing dietary guidelines, and they haven’t changed all that much. A revised bunch of recommendations released this month includes a new cap on added sugar. The guidelines have been a failure in checking the rise of obesity and diabetes. The problem, the Wall Street Journal article suggests, is a reliance on weak science.

I don’t know who relies on the federal government’s dietary guidelines, nor who even sees them. When I was in high school, admittedly quite a while ago, we still had home economics, which consisted of the basics, you could say, of ‘housewifery.’ Basic cooking and nutrition, a little sewing, maybe a bit of budgeting depending on the school , but I don’t think they’ve done that for years. The boys got ‘shop’ which was mostly coping with ‘man around the house’ stuff, making something with wood, and using tools. Forgive me if I’m not up to date, it was some time ago. I don’t think the boys ever saw the dietary guidelines either.

Congress, however is concerned about the continued toll taken by nutrition-related diseases. (The rising cost of ObamaCare is scaring everyone) They have mandated the first ever outside review by the National Academy of Medicine of the evidence underlying the dietary guidelines and the process that produces them.

I knew I’d written about the dietary guidelines before, but entering “dietary guidelines” in the search box over Bob Hope’s head in the sidebar produced 8 cranky posts. This particular one concerned the Committee’s concern with “sustainability” and the environmental food activist the USDA had hired. If you know of anyone who has posted the federal guidelines poster in their kitchen, or who has shown interest, please let me know. I just don’t think anyone except possibly the heads of school lunch programs has any interest — and that has been taken over by Michelle who came up with a program universally hated by all school children, and that schools are abandoning as rapidly as possible.

Many of the wrongheaded recommendations reach home kitchens, like butter is bad, margarine good. Eggs bad, eat lots of pasta. In short, they are usually universally wrong. Of course there are all sorts of quacks telling you what to eat online, and our grocery stores are filled with organic food, natural food, GMO free, reduced fat, sugar free, gluten free, and acres of special drinks: Texas superfoods, liquid beets, anything any producer can think of as a possible selling point. Grocery stores cater to all the enthusiasms, because that’s what people want, which means multiple fads.

I am certainly no expert, but when the agriculture department starts hiring environmental food activists, they have crossed some sort of line. Putting the nation’s corn crop into our gas tanks makes no sense either, even if Iowa farmers like it.  We have too many unaccountable bureaucracies that should simply be abolished, but thinning out the swarm of agencies in the federal government and the repetitive and often useless things they do seems to be a needed but impossible task. The agencies exist because Congress palms off the execution of tasks onto the agencies which grow and fester.

Congress said, back in the day, that we want clean air and clean water, a straightforward, simple request, which gave us the EPA — possibly the most crooked agency in the government, intent only on their own power and growth. There are a lot of agencies competing for the title though — the VA, the IRS, HHS, and HUD are all prime candidates.  It will take a lot of public pressure to get any real action, and it may be impossible. There are supposedly 47 different federal job training programs, though there may be more. Is it hopeless?



It’s Broccoli, Dear.The USDA and Michelle Want You To Eat Your Vegetables! by The Elephant's Child
June 6, 2011, 9:36 pm
Filed under: Freedom, Liberalism, Progressivism, Statism | Tags: , ,

Just last year the USDA told us that they were revising the hallowed food pyramid.

This is the old outdated one. Probably some of you saw it in health class, or saw it on the wall of the school nurse’s office. In 2009, carbohydrates were in fashion — eat lots of bread, cereal, rich and pasta:  6-11 servings a day, and watch out for the fats, oils and sweets. No  allowed amount there, use sparingly.

The New Food Pyramid from last year, which I posted it on October 27, has disappeared without a trace. Not only is it a particularly ugly graphic, but carbohydrates are still right up there in quantity.

There was apparently a revised version of the “new food pyramid” that eliminated all those confusing and troubling words, and substituted just pictures to  help the illiterate. Do you suppose it was $2 million for each version?  Hard to part with the pyramid idea, that must have been the subject of many a meeting. Notice the prominent place of dairy products in this version.

Supposedly the USDA spent $2 million on the new “my plate” design. It is being praised for being “easy to understand” (I keep telling you that they think we’re stupid). Wags have had a great time re-labeling the portions. I’d settle for cherry pie, pumpkin pie, huckleberry pie and key lime pie.  Two million dollars? The USDA was robbed!

I don’t think anyone has ever paid any attention to these. Note how Dairy has diminished in importance.  And now what was once Meat, Poultry, Fish, Dry Beans and Eggs has become a small slice of huckleberry pie protein.  Well, I say it’s spinach and I say the hell with it.*

(an ancient joke from the New Yorker)




%d bloggers like this: